Carnal Knowledge (Dannie Abse)

You, student, whistling those elusive bits
of Schubert when phut, phut, phut, throbbed the sky
of London. Listen: the servo-engine cut
and the silence was not the desired silence
between the two movements of music. Then
Finale, the Aldwych echo of crunch
and the urgent ambulances loaded
with the fresh dead. You, young, whistled again,
entered King’s, climbed the stone-murky steps
to the high and brilliant Dissecting Room
where nameless others, naked on the slabs,
reclined in disgraceful silences–twenty
amazing sculptures waiting to be vandalised.

You, corpse, I pried into your bloodless meat
without the morbid curiosity of Veslius,
did not care that the great Galen was wrong,
Avicenna mistaken, that they had described
the approximate structure of pigs and monkeys
rather than the human body. With scalpel
I dug deep into your stale formaldehyde
unaware of Pope Boniface’s decree
but, as instructed, violated you–
the reek of you in my eyes, my nostrils,
clothes, in the kisses of my girlfriends.
You, anonymous. Who were you, Mister?
Your thin mouth could not reply, ‘Absent, sir,’
or utter with inquisitionary rage.
Your neck exposed, muscles, nerves, vessels,
a mere coloured plate in some Anatomy Book;
your right hand, too, dissected, never belonged
it seemed to someone once shockingly alive,
never held surely, another hand in greeting or tenderness,
never clenched a fist in anger,
never took up a pen to sign an authentic name.
You, dead man, Thing, each day, each week,
each month, you slowly decreasing Thing
visibly losing Divine proportions,
you residue, mere trunk of a man’s body,
you, X, legless, armless, headless Thing
that I dissected so casually.
Then went downstairs to drink wartime coffee.

When the hospital priest, Father Jerome,
remarked, ‘The Devil made the lower parts
of a man’s body, God the upper,’
I said, ‘Father, it’s the other way round.’
So, the Anatomy Course over, Jerome,
thanatologist, did not invite me
To the Special Service for the Twenty Dead,
did not say to me, ‘Come for the relatives’ sake.’
(Surprise, surprise, that they had relatives
those lifeless-size, innominate creatures.)

Other students accepted, joined in the fake chanting,
organ solemnity, cobwebbed theatre.
And that’s all it would have been,
a ceremony propitious and routine,
an obligation forgotten soon enough
had not the strict priest with premeditated rage
called out the Register of the Twenty Dead-
each non-cephalic carcass gloatingly identified
with a local habitation and a name
till one by one, made culpable, the students cried.

I did not learn the name of my intimate,
the twentieth sculpture, the one next to the door.
No matter. Now all these years later
I know those twenty sculptures were but one,
the same one duplicated. You.
I hear not Father Jerome but St. Jerome cry,
‘No, John will be John, Mary will be Mary,’
as if the dead would have ears to hear
the Register on Judgement Day.
Look, on gravestones many names.
There should be one only. Yours.
No, not even one since you have no name.
In the newspapers’ memorial columns
many names. A joke.
On the canvases of masterpieces
the same figure always in disguise. Yours.
Even in the portraits of the old anchorite
fingering a dry skull are you half concealed
lest onlookers should turn away blinded.
In certain music, too, with its sound of loss,
in that Schubert Quintet, for instance,
you are there in the Adagio,
playing the third cello that cannot be heard.
You are there and there and there, nameless,
and here I am older by far and nearer,
perplexed, trying to recall what you looked like
before I dissected your face–you, threat,
molesting presence, and I in a white coat
your enemy, in a purple one, your nuncio,
writing this while a winter twig, not you,
scrapes, scrapes the windowpane.
Soon I shall climb the stairs. Gratefully,
I shall wind up the usual clock at bedtime
s (the steam vanishing from the bathroom mirror)
with my hand, my living hand.

Discussion Questions
1) Do you believe the medical student’s refusal to acknowledge the fact that the cadaver he is working with was once a human being is part of a cognitive defence mechanism? What sort of defence mechanisms do you have in place to deal with the triumphs and tragedies of medicine?
2) Who is the narrator addressing in the fourth section of the poem?


What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s